Legal Opinion

Landmark Realty v. Leasure

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 2, 2004PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.

[¶ 1] John Leasure, the judgment debt- or, appeals from a disclosure hearing order entered in the District Court (Portland, Powers, J.) ordering him to pay Landmark Realty, the judgment creditor, the sum of $200 monthly. Leasure contends that the District Court did not have subject matter jurisdiction because no valid writ of execution had been filed. Leasure also argues that the court erred in denying, as untimely, his motion for a new disclosure hearing. Landmark Realty concedes that Leasure’s motion for a new hearing was timely but argues that the court’s denial can be affirmed on other…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Homeward Residential, Inc. v. Marianne A. GregorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  2. Windham Land Trust v. JeffordsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  3. Adoption of M.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. Shrader-Miller v. MillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  5. State of Maine v. William TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API