Legal Opinion
Adriance v. Town of Standish
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 18, 1996PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
Wayne Adriance and Barbara Adriance appeal from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) in favor of the Town of Standish on their complaint seeking damages against the Town pursuant to the Maine Tort Claims Act (the Act), 14 M.R.SA. §§ 8101-8118 (1980 & Supp.1996). The Adriances contend that the court erred in concluding that certain acts and omissions by an attendant in the operation and maintenance of the Town’s waste transfer station were discretionary functions protected by the provisions of section 8104(B)(3) of the Act. We agree…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Darling v. Augusta Mental Health InstituteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Ransom v. City of Garden CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- NELSON BY AND THROUGH STUCKMAN v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Gomes v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Rodriguez v. Town of Moose RiverSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Carroll v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Hacking v. Town of BelmontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.