Rogers v. Jackson

*380Majority: CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ.

Dissenting: SAUFLEY, C.J.

CALKINS, J.

[¶ 1] Glenn Jackson appeals from a summary judgment entered in the District Court (Belfast, Worth, J.) in favor of Paul and Pamela Rogers on their claim for enforcement of a promissory note. Jackson contends that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether his payment obligation under the note was subject to an unfulfilled oral condition. We agree and vacate the judgment.

I

[¶2] On December 21, 1994, Jackson signed and delivered to the Rogers a promissory note in which he promised to…