Legal Opinion

Sievert v. Wood

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1931No. 30,038PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This action was started in justice court for the recovery of money paid to defendant by plaintiff by mistake. Defendant filed a counterclaim for commissions which the breach by plaintiff of a contract between plaintiff and defendant’s principal caused defendant to lose. Judgment was for plaintiff in justice court. Appeal was taken to the district court, where judgment was for defendant for the difference between the amount paid and the amount claimed by defendant. Trial was to the court.

The facts are best told by the findings of fact and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Tinsley v. DowellTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Gross v. HeckertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. R. G. Chapman & Co. v. McLawhornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leaderbrand v. Central State Bank of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Zeligson v. Hartman-Blair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  3. Ellingsworth v. ShannonOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Scott v. Louisville & N. R. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Glenn v. LukenbillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API