R. G. Chapman & Co. v. McLawhorn
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Action heard before O. H. Allen, J., and a jury, at August Term, 1908, of Pitt.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
This was an action to recover for guano sold the defendant.. The answer averred that the guano was bought of plaintiffs as agents of the Royster Guano Company. Chap man testified that bis firm sold the guano, as agents for the Royster Guano Company, on a del credere commission — tbat is, the agents guaranteed payment on all sales and were to turn over all notes and accounts, when called for, tbougb be says they were not always called for. Tbe plaintiffs put in evidence their contract witb the guano company, wbicb provides, “all the above fertilizers to be consigned to you, as herein provided,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Abrams v. . CuretonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- Morefield v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Boyd v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Egerton v. . CarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Underwood v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Martin v. . Mask.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Skinner v. Empresa Transformadora De Productos AgropecuariosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- First National Bank of Columbus v. RochamoraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.