Legal Opinion

Ellingsworth v. Shannon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiff, being the owner of a general merchandise business in Willamina, Oregon, engaged A. L. Lee, a business opportunity broker in Portland, Oregon, to procure a purchaser therefor, agreeing to pay said broker ten per cent of the sale price, if the business were sold.

Defendant answered said broker’s advertisement and was sent to plaintiff, whereupon negotiations took place between plaintiff and defendant.

The alleged contract, upon which this action is based, is evidenced by two letters, one from defendant to plaintiff, the other from plaintiff to defendant, which are as follows:

“1635 S.E.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tinsley v. DowellTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Shaw Wholesale Co. v. HackbarthOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Henry v. HarkerOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Lueddemann v. RudolfOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Hardy v. SheedyOregon Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gordon v. PfabSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Klimek v. PerisichOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hecketsweiler v. ParrettOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Small v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Machine Tool & Equipment Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API