Legal Opinion
Zeligson v. Hartman-Blair, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 9, 1942No. 2383PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
This is an action on a claim for loss of a broker’s commission. Zeligson, the broker, sought to recover the alleged loss from Hartman-Blair, Inc.,1 W. L. Hartman, and H. H. Blair.
The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss the amended petition and entered an order dismissing the cause without prejudice. Zeligson has appealed.
In his first amended petition, Zeligson alleged that the owner is a corporation organized under the laws of Kansas and that Hartman and Blair are its principal stockholders; that on June 26, 1939, at Wichita, *596Kansas, T. A. Morgan informed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gould v. Evansville & Crawfordsville R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Interstate Land Co. v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gene S. Jacobsen, and Cross-Appellee v. Deseret Book Company, a Utah Corporation Dean Hughes, AndCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Horton E. Ryan, Individually and as Next Friend of Shana Ryan v. W. T. ScogginCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Boulon ex rel. Boulon v. Pérez MeriSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1950
- Ogden River Water Users' Ass'n v. Weber Basin Water ConservancyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Zeligson v. Hartman-Blair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.