Legal Opinion

Plano Manufacturing Co. v. Burrows

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Leavenworth District Court. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the material facts. Judgment for the defendant Burrows, at the April term, 1887. The plaintiff company brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

VALENTINE, J.:

It is admitted that the controlling question involved in this case is as follows:

“A.B. buys property from plaintiff and gives three notes in payment; two notes remain unpaid. S.B. buys and receives the property from A. B., and verbally only promises and assumes the payment of the notes sued on; these not being paid, action thereon is prosecuted to judgment against both A.B. and S.B., before a justice, and S.B. appeals. Can the action be maintained against S. B., the judgment against A. B. still standing unreversed and unsatisfied? In…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fullam v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  2. Anthony v. HermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  3. Borchsenius v. CanutsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Follansbee v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Lee v. NewmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1877

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Griffith v. StuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Union Stove & Machine Works v. CaswellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Beck v. MegliSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  4. Beck v. MegliSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Fisher v. SpillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API