Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Hooker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2012No. 2011AP737-DPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. In this reciprocal discipline matter, we review whether to impose a six-month suspension and conditions on the license of Attorney Daynel L. Hooker to practice law in Wisconsin, as discipline reciprocal to that imposed by the State of Colorado.

¶ 2. Consistent with our decision imposing reciprocal discipline on Attorney Hooker in a prior case, In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Hooker, 2010 WI 13, *399322 Wis. 2d 552, 779 N.W.2d 419 (''Hooker I"), we determine that Attorney Hooker's license to practice law in Wisconsin should be suspended for a period of six months, retroactive to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Proceedings Against HookerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eichhorn-HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. TaberWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Stephen B. ManionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carl J. SchwedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ismael GonzalezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carl J. SchwedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daynel L. HookerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API