Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Eichhorn-Hicks

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2012No. 2011AP2326-DPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. This disciplinary proceeding involves two reciprocal discipline matters. In the first, the Supreme Court of Minnesota in 2000 suspended the license of Attorney Tracy Eichhorn-Hicks to practice law in Minnesota for a period of one year. In the second, that same court publicly reprimanded Attorney Eichhorn-Hicks in 2009 and placed him on two years of probation.

¶ 2. In light of Attorney Eichhorn-Hicks' admission of these impositions of public discipline in another jurisdiction, we impose a public reprimand and a one-year suspension as discipline reciprocal to that imposed by the Supreme…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceedings Against MoreeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Disciplinary Proceedings Against NickitasWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against Eichhorn-HicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against Eichhorn-HicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against RheesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. HookerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Stoltman (In Re Stoltman)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tracy R. Eichhorn-HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API