Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Proceedings Against Hooker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 2010No. 2009AP1099-DPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. On April 29, 2009, the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed a disciplinary complaint against Attorney Daynel L. Hooker seeking the imposition of discipline identical to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Colorado. Effective February 8, 2009, that court suspended Attorney Hooker's privilege to practice law in Colorado for one year and one day, with six months and one day stayed, upon the successful completion of a two-year period of probation. Upon our review of the matter, we conclude identical discipline is warranted. We order Attorney Hooker's license to practice law in Wisconsin…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceedings Against MoreeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. HookerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Stoltman (In Re Stoltman)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Adam A. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API