Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carl J. Schwedler
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 2017No. 2016AP001770-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*427¶ 1.
2Per curiam
On September 12, 2016, the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed a complaint and motion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.22, requesting this court suspend Attorney Carl J. Schwedler's license to practice law in Wisconsin for a period of six months, as discipline reciprocal to that imposed by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The OLR asked that we order restitution as described herein and impose costs on Attorney Schwedler. Upon review, we agree that it is appropriate to suspend Attorney Schwedler's law license for a period of six months. Consistent with the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CoplienWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. BodeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Matter of Discipline of PeirceNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. HookerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Counsel v. LapineOhio Supreme Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Carl J. SchwedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael W. StarkweatherWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020