Legal Opinion

Srour v. Barnes

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 26, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-2698PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GASCH, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

On March 9, 1986, plaintiff, Farid Srour, agreed to sell and defendant, F. Gordon Barnes, agreed to buy a parcel of real property located in the District of Columbia. The price agreed upon by the parties for the lot and for the single family dwelling which plaintiff Srour was to build upon it was $395,000. The parties memorialized their understanding by signing a standard form contract for the sale of land. They altered the otherwise routine nature of the transaction by making the purchaser’s duty to buy contingent upon the seller’s duty to accept…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Sere v. Group Hospitalization, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Speelman v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Hunter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. Wexler v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. National Consumers League v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Dye v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API