Legal Opinion
Healy v. Ratta
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 30, 1934No. 731PublishedCited by 512 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
This case comes here on appeal from a decree of the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, affirming a decree of the District Court for New Hampshire, which enjoined appellant, the chief of police for the City of Manchester, from enforcing the “ Hawkers and Peddlers Act,” c. 102, New Hampshire Laws of 1931, as an infringement of the Fourteenth Amendment. An appeal taken directly to this Court from the district court, three judges sitting, was dismissed for want of jurisdiction here since, in the lower court, appellee had waived his prayer for temporary relief. 289 U.S. 701; see Smith v.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by512 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
507 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.