Legal Opinion
Hunter v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 3, 2005No. CIV.A. 04-0303(PLF)PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs pro se complaint alleges that his car was stolen in 1988 by individuals involved in a car theft ring operated by employees of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, and that agents of the District of Columbia government committed fraud against him by not entering his car’s vehicle identification (“VIN”) number in the stolen vehicle database maintained by the National Crime Information Center (“NCIC”), thus allowing his car to be resold without alerting authorities. Defendants argue that plaintiffs complaint should…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Speelman v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Bush v. ButlerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Adams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Dye v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Hernandez v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.