Legal Opinion
Speelman v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 15, 2006No. Civil Action 05-2482 (PLF)PublishedCited by 182 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This complaint is one of dozens of nearly identical complaints brought in this Court by pro se plaintiffs against the United States under the Taxpayers Bill of Rights (“TBOR”), 26 U.S.C. § 7433. 1 Plaintiffs Robert and Karren Speelman filed this action against the United States on December 27, 2005, seeking damages, punitive damages, a refund of all taxes paid, and declaratory and injunctive relief. See Complaint at 10-13. The government has filed a motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process under Rule 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by182 opinions
- Disner v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Al-Aulaqi v. PanettaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Welsh v. HaglerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Welborn v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- De Sousa v. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.