Legal Opinion
Behrend v. Comcast Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 23, 2011No. 10-2865PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
In 2008 this Court handed down the seminal case of In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, 552 F.3d 305 (3d Cir. 2008), which outlines the standards a district court should apply in deciding whether to certify a class. This appeal by Com-cast requires us to decide if the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania properly satisfied Hydrogen’s directions in determining that questions of fact or law common to class members predominate sufficiently to satisfy Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellants contend…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Messner v. Northshore University HealthSystemCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Charles McNair v. Synapse Grp IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Roach v. T.L. Cannon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.