Legal Opinion
Charles McNair v. Synapse Grp Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 6, 2012No. 11-1743PublishedCited by 156 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JORDAN, Circuit Judge.
A group of former customers (collectively, “Appellants” or “the named plaintiffs”) of Synapse Group Inc. (“Synapse”) successfully petitioned under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) 1 for interlocutory review of an order denying class certification. More specifically, Appellants challenge the decision of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to deny certification of a Rule 23(b)(2) injunctive relief class consisting of Synapse customers who received automatic renewal notifications in connection with magazine subscriptions…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by156 opinions
- Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- ZF Meritor LLC v. Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- GBForefront LP v. Forefront Management Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- In Re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Prods. Mktg., Sales Practices & Liab. Litig.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.