Legal Opinion

Ellett v. Embury & Maurey

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County.— Hon I. H. Peres, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

The bill in this cause was filed by the complainant against Embury & Maury, cotton factors of the city of Memphis, J. H. W. Steele Company, foreign freight brokers and forwarders, with an office in the city of Memphis, and the Leyland Harrison Steamship Lines of the Kingdom of Great Britain, also with an office and agent in Memphis, for the purpose of collecting from said defendants the sum of $1,228.15, with interest, which amount he was forced to pay to the steamship company *447as freight on 400 hales of cotton shipped from Memphis to Liverpool, England, by reason of an alleged breach of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Willcox v. HinesTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Swift & Co. v. Memphis Cold Storage Warehouse Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Insurance Co. v. National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Bank v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Provident, etc., Assurance Society v. EdmondsTennessee Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shwab v. WaltersTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Tevis v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  3. Hurst Boillin Co. v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API