Legal Opinion

Bank v. Sneed

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. SterliNG Pierson, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The complainant in this cause,, by its bill, sought to recover on two promissory notes, one for $1,500, dated October 3, 1892, and due at ninety days, and the other for $3,000, dated October 22, 1892, and due at four months, made by W. A. Sneed, to the order of, and indorsed by, W. M. Sneed. At maturity these notes were presented for payment to the' maker, and this being-refused, they were protested, of all which the in-dorser had due and legal notice. No defense was made by the maker of this paper, but Mrs. Neely, the executrix of W. M. Sneed, resisted recovery upon the ground that her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. BuckmasterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  2. Wilder v. Weakley's EstateIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Van Patton v. BealsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pritchett v. Thomas Plater & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Flach v. Gottschalk Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  3. Wells v. WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Williams v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Hurst Boillin Co. v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API