Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. Memphis Cold Storage Warehouse Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1913PublishedCited by 26 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court,. Shelby County. — P. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice BuchaNAN

This was an action for damages for breach of a contract of bailment. The bailment was for hire. Swift & Co. was the bailor; the warehouse company was the bailee. The subject-matter covered by the contract was about 6,000 cases, or 2,160,000 eggs.

The complainant was an Illinois corporation; the defendant, a Tennessee corporation. The former was engaged in the business of buying and selling meats, eggs, and other products of similar character; the latter was conducting a cold storage warehouse business in Memphis, Tenn. Such was the business of the respective parties at the time of the bailment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Planters' Bank & Trust Co. v. Memphis Hotel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Ducktown Sulphur, Copper & Iron Co. v. FainTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Kirkeys & Son v. CrandallTennessee Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Computer Shoppe, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  3. Shwab v. WaltersTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Moran v. WeinbergerTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  5. E. K. Hardison Seed Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API