Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. v. National Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1890PublishedCited by 14 opinions

PROM RUTHERFORD. Appeal in ford County. error from Circuit Court of Euther-Eobt. Cantrell, J.-

1Opinion of the CourtFolkes, J.

This was an action at law to recover the amount of a policy of insurance for the sum of two thousand dollars, issued by the plaintiff in error upon a “ one:story brick, metal roof building, situated in the town of Murfreesboro, Teim.,” the property of defendant in error. To the declaration the defendant below pleaded nil debit and non assumpsit.

The case was tried by the Circuit Judge, without the intervention of a jury, resulting in a judgment for the full amount of the policy, with interest.

Motion for a new trial having been overruled, the defendant has appealed in error.

The policy contained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Breckinridge v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  2. Planters' Insurance v. MyersMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Manhattan Fire Ins. v. Weill & UllmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
  4. Mutual Life Insurance v. StibbeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  5. Hiles v. Hanover Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Continental Fire Insurance v. WhitakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Leisen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. German Insurance v. ShaderNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. WorthyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API