Hurst Boillin Co. v. Jones
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
'Mr. Justice McKinney
delivered the opinion of the Court.
These causes were consolidated for hearing and involve the same questions.
The respective complainants are wholesale merchants, and, in their bills, seek decrees for goods sold and delivered to the defendants subsequent to October 1, 1917.
The defendants are S. S. Jones and P. S. Thompson, who formed a partnership in May, 1917, for the purpose of conducting a retail mercantile business under the name of ¡3, Jones & Co.
From the formation of the partnership nntil March, 1918, S. S. Jones & Co., was a regular customer of complainants, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trentor v. PothenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Hale v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of WorldTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Insurance Co. v. National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Jenkins Bros. Shoe Co. v. G. v. Renfrow & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. HubertMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Knox-Tenn Rental Company and Robert C. Lowe v. The Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Umstattd v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
- Hospital Underwriting Group, Inc. v. Summit Health Ltd.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1989
- Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. SwallowsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Texas Co. v. DicksonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.