Legal Opinion
City of Commerce City v. State
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 11, 2002No. 01SC281PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
The question raised in this appeal is whether certain provisions of section 42-4-*1276110.5, 11 CRS. (2001) and section 42-3-11214), 11 C.R.S. (2001) regulating the manner in which cities use automated vehicle identification systems (AVIS) to enforce traf-fie laws unconstitutionally infringe on home-rule cities' powers under Article XX, Section 6 of the Colorado Constitution.1
Because we conclude that the regulation of automated vehicle identification systems to enforce traffic laws is a matter of mixed local and state concern, we hold that the challenged provisions of section 42-4-110.5 and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Walgreen Co. v. CharnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- City and County of Denver v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ainscough v. OwensSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- City of Davenport v. SeymourSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Dave Chandler Daniel Hayes Cheryl St. John Robert G. Prokop v. The City of Arvada, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- City of Northglenn v. IbarraSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.