Legal Opinion

Dave Chandler Daniel Hayes Cheryl St. John Robert G. Prokop v. The City of Arvada, Colorado

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 11, 2002No. 01-1121PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORFILIO, Senior Circuit Judge.

Arvada City Ordinance No. 3590 prohibits nonresidents of Arvada, Colorado, from circulating initiative, referendum, or recall petitions in the City of Arvada. Arvada appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of four individuals who challenged the Ordinance’s constitutionality. Arvada contends the district court erred in declaring the Ordinance unconstitutional and enjoining its enforcement. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm, in part, and reverse, in part.

I. BACKGROUND

Dave Chandler, Robert Prokop, and Cheryl St.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Libertarian Party of Virginia v. Charles JuddCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  2. Citizens in Charge, Inc. v. Jon HustedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. Nader v. BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Salehpoor v. ShahinpoorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Yes on Term Limits, Inc. v. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API