Legal Opinion

Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 29, 1983No. 83SA242PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Chief Justice.

This appeal was taken after the district court granted a writ of prohibition. The court found that the City and County of Denver (Denver) exceeded its jurisdiction by initiating proceedings under Ordinance 362 and publishing notice requiring The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, and The Burlington Northern Railroad Company (Railroads) to pay for construction of the West Eighth Avenue Viaduct (Viaduct). We affirm.

I

The present Viaduct in Denver was constructed by the Colorado State Highway Department under…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City and County of Denver v. SweetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. Ray v. DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  3. City & County of Denver v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. Town of Holyoke v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Greeley Police Union v. City Council of GreeleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. City and County of Denver v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Dempsey v. RomerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Voss v. Lundvall Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. Matter of Estate of RoyalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API