Legal Opinion

City of Northglenn v. Ibarra

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 13, 2003No. 01SC245PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

I. INTRODUCTION

In this case we determine the enforceability of Northglenn’s Ordinance 1248, which prohibits registered sex offenders from living together in a single-family residence in Northglenn. We hold that state law preempts Ordinance 1248 as it applies to a particular subset of registered sex offenders: adjudicated delinquent children whom the state places and supervises in state-created foster care families. Neither the Colorado Constitution nor state statutes grant North-glenn the power to regulate this matter of statewide concern.

The trial court convicted and fined the respondent,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. C.R.S. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. City and County of Denver v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fross v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Colorado Mining Ass'n v. Board of County Commissioners of Summit CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  3. Webb v. City of Black HawkSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  4. Millard v. RankinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
  5. City of Longmont Colorado v. Colorado Oil & Gas Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API