Legal Opinion

Ainscough v. Owens

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 24, 2004No. 03SC164PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

The question before us is whether individual state employees and their labor organizations have standing to sue the Governor and the Executive Director of the Department of Personnel to challenge a 2001 Executive Order and ensuing Personnel Policy that eliminated employee payroll deductions for union dues. In the trial court, the employees asserted eight claims for relief. They claimed that the policy violated three provisions of the Colorado Constitution (separation of powers, free speech, and state personnel system provisions) and two statutes (a payroll deduction law and the Administrative…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  2. Garhart Ex Rel. Tinsman v. Columbia/HealthOne, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. Developmental Pathways v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  4. People v. SPYKSTRASupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  5. Hickenlooper, Governor of Colorado v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, IncSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API