Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bk., Etc. v. Walsh, Admrx.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1944No. Appeal, 1PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

As some misunderstanding apparently persists in regard to the liability of a married woman on a negotiable instrument of which she is an accommodation maker or endorser the present case invites an attempt to clarify the law on that subject. It would seem that the confusion is due to a failure to distinguish between liability on the note itself and liability with respect to a judgment obtained or confessed on the note.

W. O. Lashell and Elizabeth H. Lashell, his wife, executed a judgment note dated February 13, 1932, to the First National Bank of Yerona,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sears v. BirbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Yeany, ex rel. Gold Standard National Bank v. ShannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Newtown T. T. Co. v. Underw'd (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Bank v. PooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Littster v. LittsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vallish v. RapoportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. First Seneca Bank & Trust Co. v. Laurel Mountain Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. De Feo v. Dibacco Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Keiper v. KeiperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Estate of Berk v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API