De Feo v. Dibacco Et Ux.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ross, J.,
Judgment was entered by the plaintiff against the defendants, husband and wife, on a judgment note in the sum of $550, dated July 21, 1930, and signed by both of them. The judgment was entered on December 6, 1937 and revived by sci. fa. on November 18, 1942. The defendants, on December 27. 1944, presented a petition for a rule to show cause why the said judgment should not be opened and the defendants let into their defenses (1) that the wife defendant had signed the note as an accommodation endorser, and (2) payment. The rule was made absolute on December 9, 1946 and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holt v. PariserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Bank v. PooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- First Nat. Bk., Etc. v. Walsh, Admrx.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Gower v. Harakal Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Heitz v. Bridge Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- Swidzinski v. SchultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Logue v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Walton v. Chilla, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1962