Legal Opinion

Sears v. Birbeck

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 1936No. Appeal, 67PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

On November 28, 1928, Harry C. Birbeck and Hannah Birbeck, husband and wife, signed a judgment note in which they promised to pay David D. Sears, or assigns, one day after date, $5,000, with interest and attorney’s fee of 10% for collection. Two days later, judgment was entered against the defendants. Execution was issued and levy made upon the household goods of Mrs. Birbeck. Thereupon she filed a petition to open the judgment, alleging that she was a married woman when she signed this note and that she signed it as a guarantor or surety for one Karl Rogowski, to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Henes v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1842
  3. Relf v. RappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  4. Pennsylvania Canal Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  5. McGlinn Distilling Co. v. DervinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MaloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Lobalzo v. VaroliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. De Reeder v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Frank v. PeckichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API