Legal Opinion

Vallish v. Rapoport

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1950No. Appeal, No. 134PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Plaintiffs, as lessors of a five-story business building-in Mt. Carmel, Pennsylvania, entered judgment by amicable action against the lessee (a) in ejectment and (b) for $2,400 rent matured for the unexpired term in consequence of the defaults alleged in the amicable action. The judgment was entered in February, 1948. The lease provided a term of five years from October 25,1943, with the right to renew for an additional term of five years. *27On November 29, 1948, tbe lessee defendant petitioned for and obtained a rule to show cause why the judgment in ejectment should…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fidelity Trust Co. v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Schireson v. ShaferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Berkowitz v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Caskie v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Joseph Melnick Building & Loan Ass'n v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Smith v. DaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. ROSE v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Matlock v. LipareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Kuntz v. Lanbar Hotel Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Johnson v. LeffringSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API