Newtown T. T. Co. v. Underw'd (Et Al.)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Appellant and her husband gave a judgment note to plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered against both of them. Subsequently, upon petition filed, appellant obtained a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened so far as she was concerned. An answer was filed by plaintiff, depositions were taken, the court below refused to open the judgment, and the wife appeals. The order is right and must be affirmed.
Appellant seems to think that if she can show some evidence from which, if believed, the jury could find that the money loaned was ultimately received by her…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Charles D. Kaier Co. v. O'brienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Spotts' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Young's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. RagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- McGarrity v. McMahonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n v. WalukiewiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Stoner v. Sley System GaragesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Northampton Brewery Corp. v. LandeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Matovich v. Gradich Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Fulcomer v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.