Legal Opinion
Coppola v. Logistec Connecticut, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 3, 2007No. SC 17604PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
The plaintiff, Michael Coppola, appeals1 from the decision of the compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the third district (commissioner) dismissing for lack of jurisdiction the plaintiffs claim pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (state act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq. The plaintiff claims on appeal that the board improperly concluded that the commissioner lacked jurisdiction over his claim against the named defendant, Logistec Connecticut, Inc.,2 because the injury occurred on the navigable…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. Perini North River AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Marandino v. Prometheus PharmacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Deschenes v. Transco, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Bogart v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Gerte v. Logistec Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Uphold v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.