Legal Opinion

Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 14, 1995No. 94-325PublishedCited by 563 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This case asks us to clarify what “employment-related connection to a vessel in navigation,” McDermott Int’l, Inc. v. *350Wilander, 498 U. S. 337, 355 (1991), is necessary for a maritime worker to qualify as a seaman under the Jones Act, 46 U. S. C. App. § 688(a). In Wilander, we addressed the type of activities that a seaman must perform and held that, under the Jones Act, a seaman’s job need not be limited to transportation-related functions that directly aid in the vessel’s navigation. We now determine what relationship a worker must have to the vessel, regardless of the specific tasks the…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by563 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Tandon v. Captain's Cove Marina of Bridgeport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. McCoy v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008

558 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API