Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
This case asks us to clarify what “employment-related connection to a vessel in navigation,” McDermott Int’l, Inc. v. *350Wilander, 498 U. S. 337, 355 (1991), is necessary for a maritime worker to qualify as a seaman under the Jones Act, 46 U. S. C. App. § 688(a). In Wilander, we addressed the type of activities that a seaman must perform and held that, under the Jones Act, a seaman’s job need not be limited to transportation-related functions that directly aid in the vessel’s navigation. We now determine what relationship a worker must have to the vessel, regardless of the specific tasks the…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by563 opinions
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Tandon v. Captain's Cove Marina of Bridgeport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- McCoy v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Denoux v. Vessel Management Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
558 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.