Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
In this case the Washington Supreme Court held that the State could not, consistently with the Federal Constitution, make an award under its state compensation law to *251the widow of a workman drowned in a navigable river. The circumstances which caused the court to reach this conclusion were these:
The petitioner’s husband, a structural steelworker, was drowned in the Snohomish River while working as an employee of the Manson Construction and Engineering Company, a contributor to the Workmen’s Compensation Fund of the State of Washington. Contributions of Washington employers to this Fund are…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by354 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
349 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.