Legal Opinion

Wildflower International, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 5, 2012No. 11-734 CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*367 OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

Plaintiff, Wildflower International, Ltd. (“Wildflower”), filed this pre-award bid protest action against defendant, the United States, on November 3, 2011. See Compl. (docket entry 1). Wildflower challenges the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), Customs and Border Protection’s (“CBP”) decision to terminate Wildflower’s delivery order for convenience and to repost a revised Request for Quotes (“RFQ”) as part of CBP’s “corrective action” with respect to perceived problems with the conduct of the initial procurement pursuant to the initial RFQ.…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sierra Nevada Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Whr Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. McTech Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Professional Service Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API