Legal Opinion

National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 28, 2016No. 16-362CPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bid protest; multiple awards of indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contracts; challenge by one of the awardees to a later award of an additional contract; statutory prerequisites for a bid protest; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1); standing; dispute over applicability of the Competition in Contracting Act to the later award

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

The United States Transportation Command (“TRANSCOM” or “government”) awarded five indefinite-delivery/indefmite-quantity contracts in June 2016 for multi-modal international shipping of Department of Defense and other government-approved cargo.…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Dorado Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. York Telecom Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Aero Spray, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API