Legal Opinion

Arroyo Ditch & Water Co. v. Bequette

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1906No. L.A. No. 1634PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action to recover $364.52, alleged to be due plaintiff as the defendant’s proportion of the cost of certain improvements and repairs made by plaintiff to a ditch owned in common by plaintiff, defendant, and others.

About the year 1869 certain persons, each being the owner in severalty of a tract of land susceptible of irrigation by water to be diverted from the stream now known as the old dan Gabriel River, constructed a dam in the stream for the diversion of the necessary water and made a common ditch leading from the dam to, or adjacent to, their respective tracts of land, by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stockwell v. Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Franscioni v. Soledad Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Incorporated Town of Sallisaw v. PriestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Higgins v. EvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Frazee v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API