Frazee v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
PETITION to review an. order of the Railroad Commission purporting to fix water rates. Submission set aside and time allowed to amend petition. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is a petition by forty-eight persons claiming to be entitled to receive water for irrigation and domestic use upon their lands from the Citizens Water Company of San Jacinto, to review an order of the Railroad Commission purporting to fix the rates to be charged by said Citizens Water Company for the delivery of the water to the respective petitioners and others.
The commission found that the Citizens Water Company of San Jacinto was engaged in the administration of a public use, being the delivery of water to the persons owning land under its canals and conduits. The petition alleges…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co. v. VerdugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Copeland v. Fairview Land & Water Co. & Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Strong v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thompson v. EnzMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- Brewer v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Glendale v. Crescenta Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Erwin v. Gage Canal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Thompson v. EnzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.