Legal Opinion
Cummings v. Artuz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 16, 2002No. 99Civ.11057(BSJ)(FM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Petitioner Leon Cummings (“Cummings”), seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Magistrate Judge Frank Maas issued a Report and Recommendation, dated November 12, 2002 (the “Report”), recommending that the petition be denied in all respects. 1 The Report is incorporated hereto as Attachment A. Cummings has interposed no objection to the Report. The deadline given by Magistrate Judge Maas for submission of covenants having passed, the Court now rules on the matter.
Cummings asserts that he was denied his constitutional rights to (1) a…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dunn v. SearsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Edwards v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Day v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Long v. DonnellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004