Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 2016No. 333PA14Published

1DissentJustice Beasley

The majority, in concluding that the indictment here was not facially invalid, violates a defendant’s right to be placed on reasonable notice of the charges pending against him. The majority incorrectly concludes *627that the term “business day” is not an essential element of an indictment under N.C.G.S. § 14-208.11. Our case law supports a defendant’s right to be placed on reasonable notice of the charges against him and the indictment here failed to provide reasonable notice. Because subject matter jurisdiction does not vest with the trial court under a fatally defective indictment, I…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. In re T.R.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API