Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Bradley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 12, 1999PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MUSMANNO, J.:
¶ 1 The Commonwealth appeals from the trial court’s Order suppressing evidence in this case in which Appellee Thomas Bradley (“Bradley”) was prosecuted for driving under the influence. See 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731. We affirm.
¶2 Bradley was arrested on May 30, 1996 for driving under the influence of alcohol. He filed a pre-trial Motion to Suppress claiming that his arrest was illegal and that, therefore, all evidence against him obtained following that arrest should be suppressed. The trial court granted the Motion to Suppress. The Commonwealth requested that the trial court reconsider…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Commonwealth v. CorleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. EshelmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HenrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. ColeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- McKinley v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. PetersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- McKinley v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.