Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Eshelman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 23, 1978No. 75PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EAGEN, Chief Justice.
Appellant Larry Chester Eshelman was convicted by a judge sitting without a jury of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. 1 His post-verdict motions were denied, and he was fined $500.00 and sentenced to a prison term of not less than three nor more than twenty-two months. On direct appeal the Superior Court affirmed. 2 Commonwealth v. Eshelman, 236 Pa.Super. 223, 345 A.2d 286 (1975). We granted Eshelman’s petition for allowance of appeal, and this appeal followed.
Eshelman contends that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress as the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. CorleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. LeetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. LapiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GommerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.