McKinley v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAYLOR, Justice.
Appeal was allowed to determine whether the authority vested in officers of the Harrisburg International Airport police rendered them “police officers” for purposes of enforc*567ing the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Code’s Implied Consent Law.
At the time of the incident under review, the Harrisburg International Airport (“HIA”) was owned and operated by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, through its Department of Transportation, Bureau of Aviation, which maintained authorization to employ (subject to gubernatorial approval) individuals commissioned as “police officers.”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Commonwealth v. LeetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Fishbein v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State Ex Rel. State v. GustkeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rendell v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Martin v. DOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- In Re Nomination Petition of CarrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Pennsylvania Department of Banking v. NCAS of Delaware, LLC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Synthes USA Sales, LLC v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.