Bedolla v. Logan & Frazer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
Cross-Complainants Parkside Development Company, a limited partnership, and Charles Bedolla, receiver for Parkside Develop-[Oct. ment Company (hereinafter “Parkside” or “appellant”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment entered on jury verdicts finding that the claims raised in the cross-complaint were barred by the statute of limitations. The intricate factual background leading to the controversy may be set out as follows:
Commencing in 1953, Richard H. Grant (“Grant”) and Way Choy Ching (“Ching”) solicited funds from the Chinese American community in Honolulu, Hawaii, to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Cervantez v. J. C. Penney Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.