Legal Opinion
Just v. City of Lebanon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 21, 2004No. 2003-044; A122517PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
This judicial review is one of five concerning the City of Lebanon’s decisions to annex several pieces of property and to apply particular zoning designations to those properties. James Just appealed four of the annexation and zoning decisions to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), and Friends of Linn County appealed the fifth. In each of the five cases, LUBA remanded the annexation and zoning designation because it concluded that the city had failed to meet certain annexation criteria in its comprehensive plan. Even though each of the city’s decisions concerned a different piece of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Ochoco Construction, Inc. v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Thunderbird Motel, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- DeParrie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hood River Valley Residents' Committee, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- American Federation of Teachers-Oregon v. Oregon Taxpayers United PacCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Leupold & Stevens, Inc. v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.