Legal Opinion

Owen Development Group, Inc. v. City of Gearhart

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1992No. LUBA 91-107 & 91-123; CA A72723PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s dismissal of their appeal from what they describe as a “land use decision,” contained in a letter by the Gearhart city administrator. LUBA concluded that there was no final reviewable land use decision. We affirm.

In 1985 and 1986, respectively, the city approved petitioners’ applications for preliminary and final development plan approval and a conditional use permit for a shopping center. The property is located in a mixed residential-commercial zone that has no permitted uses and that allows as conditional uses those that are permitted in two of the city’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Medford Assembly of God v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Terraces Condominium Ass'n v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Town of Rhine v. BizzellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Recovery House VI v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Weeks v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Hillyer's Mid-City Ford, Inc. v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Mar-Dene Corp. v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API