Cogan v. City of Beaverton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Petitioner City of Beaverton (the city) seeks review of a decision of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) reversing the city’s decision denying respondent Leupold & Stevens, Inc.’s (Leupold) petition for a minor boundary change. On review, the city contends that LUBA erred for two reasons. First, the city complains that LUBA did not properly construe the term “area of land” as used in Oregon Laws 2005, chapter 844, section 6, which is compiled as a note before ORS 222.111. Second, the city asserts that LUBA erred in concluding that Leupold’s petition for a minor boundary change was not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Bloomfield v. WeaklandOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Leupold & Stevens, Inc. v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- LEUPOLD & STEVENS, INC. v. City of BeavertonOregon Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leupold & Stevens, Inc. v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State ex rel. Leupold & Stevens, Inc. v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- STATE EX REL. LEUPOLD & STEVENS, INC. v. City of BeavertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009