Legal Opinion

Hickson v. Noroton Manor, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 8, 1934PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

On October 24th, 1928, the defendant deeded to the plaintiff certain property described in the deed as a portion of lot number thirty-two on a map of property of the defendant in Noroton, with a covenant of warranty that the same was free from all encumbrances except certain conditions and restrictions mentioned in the deed. The plaintiff claims a breach of the covenant of warranty, in that the land conveyed to her is subject to certain other restrictions in favor of the owners of other lots in the tract upon such map, and that, by reason of such restrictions the title to the premises is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. LeveroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Whitton v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. Bickell v. MoraioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Howland v. AndrusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  5. Pierce v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Callaham v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Forrest Construction, Inc. v. MilamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Matthews v. Kernewood, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  4. Contegni v. PayneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Belleview Construction Co. v. Rugby Hall Community Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API